HARRY POTTER and the CGI plague

Friday, July 10, 2009


If you've read to the end of the Harry Potter books, you know there's a scene at the conclusion of Harry Potter & The Deathly Hallows where we flash ahead to see Harry, Ron and Hermione as adults in their late thirties. Producer David Heyman tell the IMDB they are considering "Benjamin Button" technology to age the actors for the final film.

"A lot of Benjamin Button is making them look younger," he tells the site, "and we're taking people, who are 20 years old, and making them look like they're in their late 30s, so that's a different experience.

"We may use some of the techniques that they did in Benjamin Button, but we're going to do everything we can and it will be Daniel, Emma and Rupert in the parts and not some other actors."

I have a revolutionary special effects suggestion that will save Heyman a few million bucks and look a heck of a lot better than anything you could do with computer effects: use some damn makeup. You probably wouldn't even need elaborate prosthetics. Just smear a little greasepaint under the actors' eyes, maybe pencil in a crow's foot here and there, slap a mustache on Rupert Grint. Done and done.

One of the weaknesses of the Potter movie series (and pretty much every effects picture since 1990-something) is an over-reliance on CGI. Computer effects can be very effective, and they can do things that would be difficult if not impossible to do with old-fashioned effects techniques. But more often than not, they just look fake.

Compare the Yoda of The Empire Strikes Back and the CGI Yoda of the last two Star Wars prequels. The original Yoda has weight and a physical presence onscreen, he feels like a living character. The CGI Yoda is like a character from Shrek pasted on top of the live action footage. In the Potter series, characters like the Sorting Hat and the centaurs are distractingly unreal. The Sorting Hat would have been much more effective as a puppet, and the centaurs would have worked a lot better as live actors with artificial horse legs.

Of course, Heyman could just wait a few years, and film the actors without makeup. As it is, Daniel Radcliffe already looks about 30.

Got a tip for Monsters and Rockets? Want to contribute to the site? Send us an email.

1 comments:

Anonymous November 25, 2009 at 8:58 AM  

CGI is overused! Practical effects look better. Computer graphics are a great tool, but producers are misusing it, resulting in flat painted characters.

Post a Comment

About This Blog

"Science fiction plucks from within us our deepest fears and hopes, then shows them to us in rough disguise: the monster and the rocket." - W.H. Auden

Who is he, this one who is called "Greg Stacy"?

Greg Stacy began the MONSTERS AND ROCKETS blog in April of 2009. Prior to that, he was editor of the popular sci-fi/horror news website DARKWOLDS.COM. He has also written for LA WEEKLY, OC WEEKLY, UTNE READER and LOS ANGELES CITYBEAT. He always feels weird writing about himself in the third person.

  © Free Blogger Templates Nightingale by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP